Extreme Measures Planmine™ Help Desk
About Us
Sign In / Up

Extreme Measures

This help desk is a free resource intended for discussion purposes only. Neither BOMA, its chapters, affiliates, or Extreme Measures Inc.® are responsible for the information, comments or opinions expressed herein. For complete information, refer to the official publications of the standards themselves.

FAQ & Read-Me Articles
BOMA for Office Overview
BOMA for Industrial Overview
BOMA for Retail Overview
BOMA for Multi-Unit Residential Overview
BOMA Mixed-Use Overview
BOMA Gross Areas Overview
IPMS for Office Overview
Alternative Methodologies
Glossary of Industry Terms
What are as-built drawings / models?
What is CAD and BIM?
How do I resolve an area dispute?
Where can I get measurement standards publications?

Mail Conveyers and Chutes

Brett Butler
PWGSC
August 26, 2015

We have many buildings that have Mail Conveyers and Chutes! Some buildings are multi-Tenant, some are single Tenant. The Mail Conveyer systems may or may not be currently used in all the buildings! What space Catagory should they be outlined as?

Thanks,
Brett

Adam Fingret
Extreme Measures Inc.
August 27, 2015

Hi Brett,

Mail conveyors and chutes are not covered by the Standard, nor is anything similar in nature. In the case of horizontally installed systems at floor or ceiling, these have no impact on floor area - simply ignore them. In the case of vertical systems that penetrate the slabs/levels of a building, you need to decide if these constitute Major Vertical Penetrations or Occupant Voids.

In my opinion these vertical conveyors should probably be Occupant Voids as they are basically tenant improvements and could be removed from the building without impacting the functionality of the building (such as access, egress, hvac, etc).

As Occupant Voids, the area of openings are documented under the Standard, but are not removed from Occupant or Rentable Area.

Hope this helps.

Your Comments ...

Please allow up to 24 hours for your question to appear after it is reviewed.